| HIV 
Positive and HIV Negative Patients Have Similar Survival Rates after Liver Transplantation, 
but HCV Recurrence Remains a Risk By 
Liz Highleyman
 
  With 
the development of effective combination 
antiretroviral therapy, organ transplants are no longer considered universally 
contraindicated for HIV positive people, 
but studies of transplant outcomes in this population have produced conflicting 
data. Two 
study presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the European 
Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL 2009) last month in Copenhagen 
add to this body of knowledge, indicating that HIV positive liver transplant recipients 
have survival rates similar to those of HIV negative people, but recurrence of 
hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major challenge. U.K. 
-- 1994-2008 In 
the first study, D Joshi, K. Agarwal, and colleagues from the Institute of Liver 
Studies at Kings College Hospital in London analyzed data from the prospective 
U.K. transplant database to determine long-term outcomes for HIV positive adults 
(age 18 or older) receiving cadaver liver transplants.  The 
investigators evaluated more than 6000 liver transplants performed between March 
1994 and April 2008. Of these, 5435 recipients had neither HIV nor HCV, 847 (13.4%) 
had HCV but not HIV, and 33 (0.5%) were HIV-HCV coinfected.  HIV 
positive patients were younger on average than HIV negative recipients (mean 42 
vs 51 years), and the coinfected group was even younger (mean 40 years). The 3 
groups had comparable MELD (Model for End Stage Liver Disease) scores, a measure 
of liver disease severity and risk of death while awaiting a transplant. Looking 
at just the HIV positive group, 29 patients (87.8%) were men, 16 (48.5%) were 
HIV-HCV coinfected (HCV antibody positive), 6 (18.2%) were hepatitis B virus (HBV) 
coinfected (HBsAg positive), and 11 (33.3%) had neither HCV nor HBV. Results  
 As a group, HIV positive patients had a significantly lower average duration of 
survival after liver transplantation than HIV negative individuals (mean 44 vs 
57 months; P = 0.0001). 
 
  The HIV-HCV coinfected group had a significantly lower mean survival duration 
than patients with HCV alone (29 vs 48 months; P = 0.04). 
 
  Compared with the HCV monoinfected group, survival rates were significantly lower 
in the HIV-HCV coinfected group (P = 0.05): 
  
 1 year: 87% vs 73%. 
  5 years: 69% vs 53%
  
 However, there was no statistically significant difference in survival rates between 
HIV positive and HIV negative patients without HCV (P = 0.84): 
  
 1 year: 87% in both groups; 
  5 years: 74% vs 78%.
  
 In a univariate analysis, HCV infection was a significant predictor of death after 
liver transplantation in HIV patients (odds ratio [OR] 10; P = 0.047). 
 
  In a multivariate logistic regression model including HIV-HCV coinfection, MELD 
score, and recipient and donor ages, the effect of coinfection was not independent 
of the other variables (OR 8.8; P = 0.612).
 "Our 
data suggests that HIV positive patients have a good prognosis post-liver transplant," 
the investigators concluded. "Survival in [HIV-HCV coinfected] patients is 
significantly worse compared to [HCV monoinfected] and [HIV monoinfected] patients." "These 
study results are valuable confirmation that selected HIV positive patients are 
as suitable candidates for liver transplant as HIV negative patients and should 
have similar access to treatment," said Agarwal. The 
poorer post-transplant outcomes of HIV-HCV coinfected patients emphasize the need 
for antiviral therapy early in the course of HCV-related liver disease for this 
population, the researchers advised.
 "We are desperate to get the 
newer agents, evolving agents, tested in this population at an early stage, because 
they have clearly an urgent need for drugs to control hepatitis C replication," 
co-investigator J. O'Grady told MedPage Today, referring to directly targeted 
"STAT-C" drugs now undergoing clinical trials in HIV negative hepatitis 
C patients.
 
 Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, 
UK; Statistics and Audit Directorate, UK Transplant, Bristol, UK.
 Spain 
-- 2001-2008
 In 
the second study, A. Moreno and colleagues from Hospital Ramon y Cajal in Madrid, 
Spain, evaluated the impact of HIV coinfection on outcomes of liver transplant 
candidates with cirrhosis 
related to hepatitis B or C.
 
 The researchers tracked the progress of all 
272 patients with viral hepatitis and cirrhosis included on the liver transplant 
waiting list from January 2001 through October 2008. Within this group, 223 (82%) 
had HCV alone, 35 (13%) had HBV 
alone, and 14 (5%) had both HBV and HCV. A total of 37 transplant candidates 
(14%) had HIV. All the HIV positive patients were either HIV-HCV 
coinfected or HIV-HCV-HBV triple infected (none were HIV-HBV 
coinfected without HCV).
 
 Results
  Rates of liver transplantation, withdrawal from the waiting list, and death differed 
significantly between HIV positive and HIV negative transplant candidates (P = 
0.001). 
  Transplant received: 32% vs 57%; 
  Withdrawal from list: 8% vs 15%; 
  Death 46% vs 22%.
  There were no significant differences, however, when comparing patients with cirrhosis 
related to HBV versus HCV. 
  Transplant received: 57% vs 54%; 
  Withdrawal from list: 20% vs 14%; 
  Death 20% vs 26%.
  The probability of survival on the waiting list was significantly lower for HIV 
positive compared with HIV negative transplant candidates (P = 0.0001): 
  90 days: 68% vs 88%; 
  180 days: 57% vs 77%; 
  365 days: 47% vs 72%.
  Among candidates who did receive donor livers, there were no significant differences 
in survival between HIV positive and HIV negative patients: 
  1 year: 100% vs 85%; 
  3 years: 76% vs 71%; 
  5 years: 51% vs 65%.
  Survival rates were also comparable between patients with HBV-related and HCV-related 
cirrhosis. 
  
 1 year: 94% vs 85%; 
  3 years: 83% vs 70%; 
  5 years: 71% vs 62%.
  However, HIV positive patients were significantly more likely than those in the 
HCV monoinfected group to require pegylated 
interferon/ribavirin to treat recurrent HCV infection in their new liver (58% 
vs 27%; P = 0.04). 
 
  The risk of death related to HCV recurrence was also higher among HIV positive 
compared with HIV negative transplant recipients (100% vs 25%; P = 0.02). 
 
  Independent predictors of mortality after liver transplantation were older age 
when added to the waiting list, higher MELD score at the time of transplant, and 
cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after transplantation.
 Based 
on these findings, the investigators concluded, "HIV [positive] subjects 
had a significantly poorer survival on waiting list."
 "The probability 
of survival after liver transplantation was similar in HIV [positive] subjects, 
but they more frequently needed [pegylated interferon/ribavirin] and 100% of deaths 
were related to HCV recurrence," they added.
 
 These findings also underscore 
the importance of treating hepatitis C and hopefully achieving sustained response 
before liver transplantation -- or better yet, before liver disease progresses 
to the stage at which a transplant becomes necessary.
 
 Infectious Diseases, 
Liver-Gastroenterology (Liver Transplant Unit), Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Transplant 
Coordination Unit, Pathology (Liver Section), Microbiology (Virology), Hospital 
Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
 
 5/05/09
 
 References
 D 
Joshi, V Aluvihare, A Belgaumkar, and others. UK liver transplant experience of 
HIV: long term outcomes. 44th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the 
Study of the Liver (EASL 2009). Copenhagen, Denmark. April 22-26, 2009. A 
Moreno, R Bárcena, S del Campo, and others. Quereda1, Impact of HIV-coinfection 
on the outcome of viral cirrhosis liver transplant candidates at a reference center 
from 2001-2008 and predictors of post-transplant survival. EASL 2009. Copenhagen, 
Denmark. April 22-26, 2009. Other 
source M 
Smith. HIV No Barrier to Liver Transplant. MedPage Today. April 24, 2009.         
 EASL 
2009 MAIN PAGE                
  EASL 
2009 Conference Coverage
 
 HIV and Hepatitis.com Highlights from EASL 2009
 
 
                                             15th 
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2009)Coverage 
by HIV and Hepatitis.com - February 8 - 11, 2009, Montreal
 HIV and AIDS Treatment 
News, Experimental News, FDA-approved News
   Highlights 
of the 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2009) 
- Coverage by HIV and Hepatitis.com, February 8 - 11, 2009, Montreal                         
   |