TMC435
Beats Standard Therapy Regardless of HCV Genotype
SUMMARY:
TMC435 improves response rates of genotype 1 previous non-responder
hepatitis C patients, researchers report at EASL 2011. Further,
adding TMC435 helps overcome the effects of unfavorable
IL28B gene pattern and high IP-10 levels. |
By
Liz Highleyman
TMC435
is an investigational once-daily oral hepatitis C virus (HCV)
NS3/4A protease inhibitor currently in Phase 3 trials in both
treatment-naive patients and prior non-responders or relapsers.
At
the European Association for the Study of the Liver's International
Liver Congress (EASL 2011) last week
in Berlin, an international team of investigators presented
findings from the ASPIRE trial in a late-breaker poster.
ASPIRE
is an ongoing Phase 2b placebo-controlled trial evaluating the
safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of TMC435
as part of a combination regimen with pegylated interferon alfa-2a
(Pegasys) plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C patients with
hard-to-treat HCV genotype 1.
The
trial included 462 participants who did not respond or relapsed
following at least 1 prior course of pegylated interferon plus
ribavirin. The population included null-responders (< 2 log
reduction in HCV RNA by week 12 of treatment), partial responders
(>2 log reduction at week 12 but detectable at the
end of treatment), and relapsers (undetectable at the end of
treatment, but became detectable within 24 weeks after completing
therapy).
About
two-thirds of participants were men, most (about 90%) were white,
and the median age was 50 years. About 40% had HCV genotype
1a and 60% had 1b. Approximately 20% had liver cirrhosis (Metavir
F4). About 18% across all arms had the favorable IL28B CC gene
pattern and the least favorable TT pattern, with the remainder
having the CT pattern. People with HIV or hepatitis B coinfection
were excluded.
Participants
were randomly allocated to 7 treatment arms:
 |
100
mg TMC435 once-daily + pegylated interferon/ribavirin for
12 weeks, followed by pegylated interferon/ribavirin + placebo
for 36 weeks; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 once-daily + pegylated interferon/ribavirin for
12 weeks, followed by pegylated interferon/ribavirin + placebo
for 36 weeks; |
 |
100
mg TMC435 once-daily + pegylated interferon/ribavirin for
24 weeks, followed by pegylated interferon/ribavirin + placebo
for 24 weeks; |
 |
150 mg TMC435 once-daily + pegylated interferon/ribavirin
for 24 weeks, followed by pegylated interferon/ribavirin
+ placebo for 24 weeks; |
 |
100
mg TMC435 once-daily + pegylated interferon/ribavirin for
48 weeks; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 once-daily + pegylated interferon/ribavirin for
48 weeks; |
 |
Pegylated
interferon/ribavirin for 48 weeks (standard therapy control
arm). |
The
EASL poster described results from a planned interim analysis
at week 24.
Results
 |
At
24 weeks, the benefit of adding TMC435 was most evident
among prior partial responders followed by prior null responders,
while prior relapsers in all arms did well.
|
 |
24-week
response rates were as follows: |
 |
Prior
relapsers: |
 |
At
week 4, rapid virological response (RVR; HCV RNA <
25 IU/mL) rates were 79% for patients who received
100 mg TMC435 + pegylated interferon/ribavirin and
84% for those who used 150 mg TMC435 + pegylated interferon/ribavirin
(arms combined), compared with just 4% for standard
therapy recipients. |
 |
At
week 12 the corresponding rates were 88%, 95%, and
31%, respectively. |
 |
At
week 24, response rates were as follows: |
|
 |
100
mg TMC435 for 12 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
96%; |
 |
100
mg TMC435 for 24 or 48 weeks (combined) + pegylated
interferon/ribavirin: 92%; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 for 12 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
96%; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 for 24 or 48 weeks (combined) + pegylated
interferon/ribavirin: 96%; |
 |
Standard
therapy: 83% |
|
|
 |
Prior
partial responders: |
 |
Week
4 RVR were 56% for patients who received 100 mg TMC435
+ pegylated interferon/ribavirin and 67% for those
who used 150 mg TMC435 + pegylated interferon/ribavirin,
compared with no standard therapy recipients. |
 |
At
week 12 the corresponding rates were 76%, 92%, and
10%, respectively. |
 |
At
week 24, response rates were as follows: |
|
 |
100
mg TMC435 for 12 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
86%; |
 |
100
mg TMC435 for 24 or 48 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
83%; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 for 12 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
86%; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 for 24 or 48 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
89%; |
 |
Standard
therapy: 20% |
|
|
 |
Prior
null responders: |
 |
Week
4 RVR rates were 36% for patients who received 100
mg TMC435 + pegylated interferon/ribavirin and 40%
for those who used 150 mg TMC435 + pegylated interferon/ribavirin,
compared with no standard therapy recipients. |
 |
At
week 12, the corresponding rates were 63%, 64%, and
21%, respectively. |
 |
At
week 24, response rates were as follows: |
|
 |
100 mg TMC435 for 12 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
70%: |
 |
100
mg TMC435 for 24 or 48 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
74%; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 for 12 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
70%; |
 |
150
mg TMC435 for 24 or 48 weeks + pegylated interferon/ribavirin:
87%; |
 |
Standard
therapy: 45% |
|
|
 |
Overall,
6% of patients receiving TMC435 met a stopping rule due
to lack of response, compared with half of standard therapy
recipients. |
 |
18%
of TMC435 recipients, overall, experienced viral breakthrough. |
 |
Viral
breakthrough and virological failure occurred most often
among prior null responders, followed by partial responders
and then relapsers. |
 |
The overall incidence of adverse events (mostly mild or
moderate) was similar across all treatment arms, except
TMC435 recipients had more flu-like symptoms and pruritis
(itching). |
 |
About
6% of TMC435 recipients reported serious adverse events
and discontinued due to adverse events, compared with about
2% in the control group. |
In
this week 24 interim analysis, the researchers concluded, "treatment-experienced
patients who previously failed [pegylated interferon/ribavirin]
achieved significantly greater on-treatment virologic response
rates following treatment with a TMC435-containing regimen,
compared with placebo/[pegylated interferon/ribavirin] control."
"Safety and tolerability were generally similar between
TMC435-containig regimen and placebo/[pegylated interferon/ribavirin]
control group," they added.
Impact of IL28B and IP-10
In
a related oral presentation, Jeroen Aerssens described findings
from the multinational PILLAR study of TMC435 in previously
untreated HCV genotype 1 patients, focusing on the influence
of IL28B gene pattern and pre-treatment levels of interferon-gamma
inducible protein 10 (IP-10). Having the unfavorable IL28B TT
gene pattern and high IP-10 level are both associated with poorer
response to interferon-based therapy.
In
this study participants were randomly allocated to receive either
75 mg or 150 mg TMC435 in combination with pegylated interferon/ribavirin
for various durations, or else standard therapy.
During
the first 24 weeks of treatment, the favorable IL28B CC gene
pattern and low baseline serum IP-10 levels were associated
with the highest virological response rates among standard therapy
recipients. However, among patients treated with TMC-435 combination
therapy, virological response rates were high overall regardless
of IL28B or IP-10.
"The
addition of TMC435 to [pegylated interferon/ribavirin] reduces
the impact of IL28B genotype and/or baseline serum IP-10 on
virologic response up to 24 weeks of treatment," the researchers
concluded.
Investigators
will compare response rates among participants with different
IL28B gene patterns and IP-10 levels in Phase 2b and 3 trials
to determine the effect of these factors on sustained virological
response.
Investigator
affiliations:
Abstract 18: JW Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany;
Queen Marys University of London, London, UK; University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC; Hôpital Henri-Mondor,
Université Paris-Est Créteil, France; Toronto
Western Hospital Liver Centre, Toronto, Canada; Russian State
Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center,
Los Angeles, CA; Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium; Tibotec Inc,
Yardley, PA.
Abstract 199: Department of Translational Genomics & Genetics,
Department of Infectious Disease and Vaccines, Department of
Enabling Biology, Global Clinical Virology, Department of Statistics,
Department of Clinical Development, Tibotec, Beerse, Belgium;
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract 1099: Tibotec BVBA, Beerse, Belgium; Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam, Netherlands, Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium; Tibotec
Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., County Cork, Ireland; Tibotec Inc., Yardley,
PA.
4/8/11
References
S Zeuzem, GR Foster, MW Fried, et al. The ASPIRE trial: TMC435
in treatment-experienced patients with genotype-1 HCV infection
who have failed previous pegIFN/RBV treatment. 46th Annual Meeting
of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL
2011). Berlin. March 30-April 3. Abstract
6.
J Aerssen, G Fanning, A Scholliers, et al. Impact of IL28B genotype
and pretreatment serum IP-10 in treatment-naive genotype-1 HCV
patients treated with TMC435 in combination with peginterferon
alfa-2a and ribavirin in PILLAR study. 46th Annual Meeting of
the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL 2011).
Berlin. March 30-April 3. Abstract
6.
O Lenz, J de Bruijne, L Vijgen, et al. Treatment outcome and
resistance analysis in HCV genotype 1 patients previously exposed
to TMC435 monotherapy and re-treated with TMC435 in combination
with pegIFN alfa 2a/ribavirin. 46th Annual Meeting of the European
Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL 2011). Berlin.
March 30-April 3. Abstract
1099.
Other Source
Medivir.
Medivir Announces Positive Phase 2b 48-week (SVR24) Interim
Results of TMC435 in Treatment-Naive Patients Chronically Infected
With Genotype-1 Hepatitis C Virus. Press release. February 22,
2011.
Tibotec.
Tibotec Advances Global Clinical Research Program for TMC435
in HCV; Will Present Four Abstracts Evaluating Safety and Efficacy
at EASL. Press release. March 29, 2011.