| Nevirapine 
(Viramune) Has Equal Efficacy but a More Favorable Lipid Profile Compared with 
Boosted Atazanavir (Reyataz) 
 
  | ARTEN 
is an international, non-inferiority study comparing ritonavir-boosted 
atazanavir (Reyataz/r) versus nevirapine 
(Viramune), each combined with fixed-dose tenofovir/emtricitabine 
(Truvada). Week 48 results presented in a late-breaker session at the 5th 
International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention 
(IAS 2009) in Cape Town last week showed that nevirapine offers equal efficacy, 
with a more favorable lipid profile, compared with boosted atazanavir. Although 
the 2 regimens had similar rates of adverse events, discontinuations occurred 
more frequently in patients taking nevirapine. | 
 By 
Ronald Baker, PhD The 
ARTEN trial included 569 treatment-naive HIV patients who were randomly assigned 
to received 300/100mg once-daily (QD) atazanavir/ritonavir or nevirapine administered 
either 200 mg twice-daily (BID) or 400 mg once-daily, each in combination with 
the fixed-dose 300/200 mg once-daily tenofovir/emtricitabine combination pill 
(Truvada). This is the first study to compare these 2 antiretroviral 
drugs.
 Baseline demographics characteristic and HIV-related factors 
were similar in the 2 groups. The mean HIV viral load was >100,000 copies/mL 
and the mean CD4 count was 183 cells/mm3.
 
 The primary end-point was treatment 
response (TR), defined as plasma HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL at 2 consecutive visits 
without subsequent rebound or change of antiretroviral drugs prior to week 48.
 
 Results
 |  | 67% 
of the 376 patients who received nevirapine achieved the primary endpoint, compared 
with 65% of the 193 patients who received atazanavir/ritonavir (P = 0.63). |  |  | The 
mean increase from baseline in high-density lipoprotein (HDL "good") 
cholesterol was 9.6 mg/dL in the nevirapine arm and 4.0 mg/dL in the atazanavir/ritonavir 
arm (P < 0.0001). |  |  | The 
mean increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL "bad") cholesterol was 
15 mg/dL in the nevirapine group and 10.5 mg/dL in the atazanavir/ritonavir group 
(P = 0.011). |  |  | Triglyceride 
(TG) levels decreased by a mean 1.4 mg/dL from baseline in the nevirapine group, 
while increasing by 26.5 mg/dL in the atazanavir/ritonavir group (P < 0.0001). | 
 Table 
1: Week-48 results (Intent-to-treat analysis)
 
   
| Parameter | Nevirapine (N=376)(188 
BID + 188 QD)
 | Atazanavir/ritonavir (N=193) | Comparison(95% 
CI)
 |   
| % TR (Primary end-point) | 66.8 | 64.8 | 2.5 (-5.4 
to 10.4) |   
| % TR (TLOVR algorithm)* | 70.2 | 73.6 | -2.9 (-10.4 
to 4.5) |   
| TC/HDL-ratio mean change from baseline | -0.23 | +0.13 | P=0.0001 |   | HDL mean change from baseline (mg/dL) | 9.6 | 4.0 | P<0.0001 |   | TG mean change from baseline (mg/dL) | +1.4 | +26.5 | P=0.0001 |   | % Overall adverse events (grades 3 and 4) | 85.6 
(12.0 and 5.1) | 86.5 (16.1 and 3.1) | n/a |   | % Rash, all grades (discontinued) | 16.0 
(5.6) | 12.4 (0) | n/a |   | % Discontinuations due to adverse events | 12.5 | 3.6 | n/a |  BID 
= once-daily; QD =  once-daily; 
TC = total cholesterol* 
Time to loss of virological response; HIV RNA < 50 
copies/mL at wks-36 and 48 without subsequent rebound 
or change of antiretroviral drugs.
 Based 
on these findings, the investigators concluded, "Nevirapine shows non-inferior 
efficacy at week-48 versus atazanavir/ritonavir (both combined with fixed-dose 
[tenofovir/emtricitabine]). Despite similar rates of adverse events, discontinuations 
were more frequent in nevirapine than in atazanavir/ritonavir patients. Nevirapine 
demonstrated a more favourable lipid profile than atazanavir/ritonavir." Lead 
investigator Vicente Soriano from Hospital Carlos III in Madrid, Spain, said, 
"[This study] puts to rest the concerns over a potential lack of efficacy 
of nevirapine in combination with tenofovir/emtricitabine, and confirms that the 
combination of nevirapine and tenofovir/emtricitabine is a highly efficacious 
combination that offers significant benefit -- even more so to patients with cardiovascular 
risk."  7/28/09 ReferenceV 
Soriano, S Koeppe, H Mingrone, and others. Prospective comparison of nevirapine 
and atazanavir/ritonavir both combined with tenofovir DF/emtricitabine in treatment-naïve 
HIV-1 infected patients: ARTEN study week 48 results. 5th International AIDS Society 
Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention (IAS 2009). Cape Town, 
South Africa. July 19-22, 2009. Abstract 
LBPEB07.
 
 
                              
 | 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |