Abacavir
(Ziagen) Does Not Compromise Effectiveness of Hepatitis C Treatment, but
Zidovudine (Retrovir) May Reduce Response
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
SUMMARY:
Using a nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor
(NRTI) backbone containing abacavir
(Ziagen, also in the Epzicom
coformulation) was not associated with poorer response to
interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C in HIV/HCV coinfected
patients, researchers reported at the 17th Conference on Retroviruses
and Opportunistic Infections (CROI
2010) last month in San Francisco. However, backbones
containing zidovudine
(AZT; Retrovir) and possibly didanosine
(ddI; Videx) were associated with a lower likelihood of
achieving a sustained response. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By
Liz Highleyman
The effect
of accompanying antiretroviral
drugs on virological response to hepatitis C therapy using interferon
plus ribavirin remains uncertain, given that prior studies have
produced conflicting results. Like ribavirin, zidovudine can cause anemia,
which may increase the risk of ribavirin dose reduction and premature
discontinuation. Some studies have suggested that abacavir
might be linked to poorer response, but data
have not been consistent.
To further explore this issue, Juan Berenguer and colleagues evaluated
the effect of antiretroviral drugs, particularly abacavir, on response
to pegylated interferon
plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.
The investigators conducted a retrospective pooled analysis of 2 cohorts
of HIV/HCV coinfected patients starting hepatitis C treatment: GESIDA
3603 (enrolled between January 2000 and July 2007 at 20 centers in Spain)
and GESIDA 5006 (enrolled between January 2003 and June 2005 at 36 centers).
In GESIDA 5006, the main objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy
of interferon-based therapy in coinfected patients taking ART that included
tenofovir vs other NRTIs.
The analysis included a total of 1701 coinfected patients. Most (75%)
were men and the median age was 41 years. A majority (63%) had hard-to-treat
HCV genotypes 1 or 4, two-thirds had high HCV viral load, and 27% had
advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Most (88%) were on ART, 74% had HIV
viral load < 50 copies/mL, and the median baseline CD4 cell count
was high, at 514 cells/mm3.
About 60% were treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) and
40% received pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PegIntron), both with ribavirin
(typically weight-adjusted). The study outcome measure was sustained
virological response (SVR), or undetectable HCV viral load 24 weeks
after completion of treatment.
Results
 |
The
overall SVR rate was 38%: |
 |
25% for genotypes 1 and 4; |
 |
61%
for genotypes 2 and 3. |
|
 |
In
a multiple logistic regression analysis, the following factors were
independently associated with increased odds of sustained response: |
 |
HCV
genotype 2 or 3 (adjusted odd ratio [OR] 5.31); |
 |
Absence
of AIDS-defining conditions (adjusted OR 1.75); |
 |
Baseline
HVC RNA < 500,000 IU/mL (adjusted OR 1.73). |
|
 |
44%
of participants receiving any ART achieved SVR, compared with 37%
of those not on any ART (not a significant difference). |
 |
Looking
at NRTI backbones yielded the following SVR rates: |
|
 |
Tenofovir
+ lamivudine
(3TC; Epivir) or emtricitabine
(Emtriva): 42% (21% for genotypes 1 or 4 only); |
 |
Lamivudine
+ stavudine (d4T; Zerit): 39% (19%); |
 |
Abacavir
+ lamivudine (without zidovudine): 37% (26%); |
 |
Zidovudine
+ lamivudine (all): 35% (19%); |
 |
Zidovudine
+ lamivudine (without abacavir): 36% (18%); |
 |
Zidovudine
+ lamivudine (with abacavir): 33% (19%); |
 |
Didanosine
+ lamivudine or emtricitabine: 25% (17%); |
 |
Didanosine
+ stavudine: 21% (10%). |
|
 |
Regimens containing zidovudine (all and without abacavir) were significantly
less effective than regimens containing tenofovir. |
 |
Otherwise,
the effect of other NRTI backbones had little effect on SVR. |
 |
Response
rates were lower with didanosine backbones, but few patients used
such regimens and the differences did not reach statistical significance. |
 |
No
significant differences were found between the different backbones
when repeating the analysis for patients receiving < 800 mg/kg
ribavirin or less than the median or first quartile ribavirin doses. |
 |
Likewise,
no significant differences were found between the backbones when
analyzing subgroup of patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4, or those
with HCV RNA > 500,000 IU/mL. |
 |
Also,
no significant differences were found according to whether the NRTI
backbone was accompanied by a NNRTI or a boosted or unboosted protease
inhibitor. |
Based
on these findings, the investigators concluded, "Our results suggest
that, with the exception of regimens including [zidovudine], accompanying
antiretroviral drugs have little effect on virologic response to [pegylated
interferon] plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV patients."
"We
did not find abacavir to negatively impact the outcome of [pegylated
interferon] plus ribavirin therapy even in difficult-to-treat patients
such as those with genotypes 1 and 4 and high HCV RNA," they added.
Hosp
Gen Univ Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Hosp Donostia,
Spain; Hosp Ramon y Cajal, Spain; Hosp Clin, Barcelona, Spain; Hosp
Univ La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hosp Univ La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hosp Principe
de Asturias, Spain.
3/2/10
Reference
J
Berenguer, M von Wichmann, C Quereda, and others. Effect of Accompanying
Antiretroviral Drugs on Virologic Response to PEG-IFN and Ribavirin
in HIV/HCV-Co-infected Patients. 17th Conference on Retroviruses &
Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2010). San Francisco. February 16-19,
2010. (Abstract
663).