HIV-HCV
Coinfected Patients Treated with NRTI-Sparing Antiretroviral Regimens Respond
Better to Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin
 | HIV-HCV
coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin achieved
a sustained virological (SVR) rate of 54% -- the same as HIV negative individuals
-- and sustained response was more likely in patients who did not take a nucleoside/nucleotide
reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) as part of their combination antiretroviral
regimen. |
|
By
Liz Highleyman The
effect of NRTIs on response to interferon-based
treatment for chronic HCV remains controversial. In particular, some studies
have found that abacavir (Ziagen,
also in the Trizivir and Epzicom
coformulations) is associated with poorer response, but others have not observed
this effect. As
reported in a poster at the 5th International AIDS Society
Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention (IAS 2009) last
month in Cape Town, German researchers conducted a prospective, partially randomized
study comparing hepatitis C treatment outcomes in HIV negative individuals (Group
A; n = 60), HIV positive patients not on combination
antiretroviral therapy (ART) (Group B; n = 46), and HIV positive patients
on ART (Group C; n = 68). Participants
in Group C were randomly assigned to take either a NRTI-free regimen consisting
of dual protease inhibitors (PIs)
or a PI plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)
(Group C1; n = 20), or else a standard HAART regimen consisting of 2 NRTIs
plus a PI or NNRTI
(Group C2; n = 48). Approximately
60% of participants had hard-to-treat HCV
genotypes 1 or 4. Patients were initially treated with 180 mcg pegylated
interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) plus 800 mg/day ribavirin (lower than the usual
1000-1200 mg/day weight-adjusted dose for hard-to-treat genotypes) for 24 weeks
if they had HCV genotypes 2 or 3, or 48 weeks if they had genotypes 1 or 4 (guidelines
recommend 48 weeks for coinfected patients regardless of genotype). The protocol
was later amended to treat genotype 2 or 3 patients for 48 weeks and to increase
the ribavirin dose for those with genotypes 1 or 4. Results  |
In an intent-to-treat (missing=failure) analysis, SVR rates were comparable between
HIV positive and HIV negative patients, both at 54%. |  | SVR
rates did not differ significantly between Group B (ART) and Group C (no ART),
at 59% vs 52%, respectively. |  | However,
there was a significant difference between patients in Group C1 (NRTI-sparing)
and Group C2 (NRTI-containing), at 75% vs 42%, respectively (P = 0.031). |  | In
a post-hoc multivariate analysis of Group C patients according to SVR status,
low baseline HCV RNA, genotype 2 or 3, and no use of abacavir were independent
predictors of SVR. |  | After
restricting the analysis to genotype 1 or 4 patients who received weight-adjusted
ribavirin, however, only baseline HCV RNA remained a significant predictor. |
"High
SVR rates, comparable to HIV negative patients, were reached in 55% of HIV positive
patients," the investigators concluded. NRTI-free
HAART resulted in higher SVR rates compared with NRTI-containing regimens, they
added, suggesting, "This effect was most likely due to use of abacavir in
patients with low doses of ribavirin." Bonn
University, Bonn, German; Practice Hintsche/Klausen, Berlin, Germany; Infektiologikum
Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Charite University Medical Center, Berlin,
Germany; University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; Ärzteforum Seestrasse,
Berlin, Germany; Praxis Dupke/Baumgarten/Carganico, Berlin, Germany; Institut
für Interdisziplinäre Medizin, Hamburg, Germany; University of Würzburg,
Würzburg, Germany; Practice John, Berlin, Germany; Praxiszentrum Kaiserdamm,
Berlin, Germany. 8/11/09 Reference M
Vogel, G Ahlenstiel, G Klausen, and others. The effect of nucleoside free HAART
on the treatment of chronic HCV infection. 5th International AIDS Society Conference
on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment, and Prevention (IAS 2009). July 19-22, 2009. Cape
Town, South Africa. Abstract WEPEB235. (Abstract).
|
|